Twardon.org  | A. Twardon & Associates | MINDTransActions  InterNETional | Postmodern Psychotherapy | Buddhist Psychology 

MIND is                 Home   |  Buddhist Clinic  |  Mental Health  |  Twardon.org New!

 


 

NEW SITE

 

TWARDON.ORG

 


 

PSYCHOLOGY

 

BUDDHIST CLINIC

 

DHARMA

 

SCIENCE

 

RELIGION

 

LANGUAGE

 

ART  GALLERY

 


 

GREAT MINDS

 

Buddha

Jesus

Dogen

Einstein

Freud

Gandhi

Lacan

Nagarjuna

Hui  Neng

Bach

Wittgenstein

Derrida

Picasso

Shakespeare

Copernicus

Joyce

Mozart

Jung

Proust

 

Submit a name


 Suggest a Link


 

A TWARDON PhD

 


 

ANNA TWARDON

 



 


 

 

 

 


PSYCHOLOGICAL  MEDITATIONS 


Archives / Links   

2000     ---         Summer     Autumn    Winter   

2001  Spring     Summer     Autumn     Winter

2002  Spring     Summer

Postmodern Psychotherapy    Postmodern Psychology & Buddhist Practice 

American Dogen / Maitreyam Buddha


Autumn  2002


 

Towards Postmodern Psychology and Psychotherapy

 

(work in progress)

 

see Postmodern Psychology and Psychotherapy for full and most current update of this text

 

"Life is full of suffering because of a fundamental lack, not only a perception of a lack, but the actual lack of our absence." 

 

Postmodern psychology and psychotherapy can not be reduced to a definition.

They do not exist as a “thing” or a “theory” to be labeled or categorized, and it is not immediately apparent how exactly they do “exist” because the very notion of “being” is itself under intense questioning when they are practiced.

They are not anything that already has, or can be described using, a recognized name, or we should say, they are not only that.

 

Without rejecting anything, postmodern psychotherapy is more than just psychoanalysis, more that just psychiatry, more than psychology, it is more than psychotherapy.  It is “more” not because it rejects anything, it is “more” because it completely embraces and employs each of them, simultaneously,  in their totality, nothing excluded, in its endeavor to grasp the Mind and to alleviate human suffering.

 

What is that which is more than “psychoanalysis”, “psychiatry”, “psychology” and “psychotherapy” without rejecting any of them?

 

Postmodern Psychotherapy engages three great traditions within which Truth and subjectivity of the Mind have been explored throughout history  – Art (truth of beauty, aesthetics), Religion (truth of God / spirituality, ethics) and Science (truth / philosophy of knowledge).

 

Postmodern psychotherapy can only be contextualized as that which is “not- different”. It is that which is practiced from a place not-different from Lacan’s Real, not-different from Buddhist Emptiness, not-different from the Truth of science or Being of philosophy – it is the Truth / Real / Being / Emptiness practicing psychotherapy, a psychotherapy of the Real-Truth-Being-Emptiness.

 

One needs the Real and Being to be-come alive as a subject, one needs the Truth to understand, one needs Mind to experience and embody Emptiness.

 

One has to embrace and be the Real, the Truth, Mind and Emptiness to become  truly liberated and psychologically healthy.

 

But what is Real? What is Truth? What is Emptiness? What is Being? What is Mind? And, of course, to the extent the spiritual realm overlaps with the psychological, what is God?

 

How does one explore, understand, embrace, become and practice the Real, the Truth, Mind and Emptiness in one’s life? What does it mean to become liberated and healthy? How does one meet one's God?

 

Postmodern psychotherapy provides a context, a container, a structure, a process that enable one to engage those questions with full body and mind in an attempt to alleviate one’s suffering, psychological dysfunction or symptoms of a mental disorder.

 

It constructs a composite of psychodynamic therapy, cognitive neuroscience, psychology, psychiatry, Buddhism, quantum theory and semiotics used conjointly in the treatment of mental disorders and in facilitating personal growth.

 

Postmodern psychology addresses each person at the level of the subjective experience conceptualized as inter-subjectivity

It assumes that each person’s subjective experience is the central and fundamentally self-validating, non-reducible characteristic of being human and conscious. Within the collective / consensual reality we all share, every person constructs a unique, distinctly subjective version of reality, lives within it and enacts it in one’s inter-actions with others.

At the same time, however, it is acknowledged that each person’s subjective experience is always affected by an infinite number of physical, chemical, biological, cultural, interpersonal, psychological and symbolic factors, exerting their influence across time and space, only few of which we know and understand at this time. Subjective experience is influenced by outside objects.

 

One “becomes”, eventually, that which one has been “subject-ed” to.

 

Subjects and objects mutually co-construct each other and become, in the final analysis, impossible to separate. What one “was not” before, one “becomes” now by being infused with it. Every subject is always also an object, every object always a subject. Subjective reality, fundamentally, is not exclusively (nor exclusive) of any “one” – it is always co-constructed, possible only as a collective  “inter-subject-hood” of one “Reality”. The subjective - consensual axis forms one of the main windows into one's internal life and behavior.

Postmodern psychotherapy combines psychoanalysis, DSM-based psychiatry, cognitive science, Buddhism and semiotics within the practice and technique parameters of psychodynamic therapy. Psychoanalysis, psychology and psychiatry provide the theoretical framework and clinical foundation assuring that all commonly accepted guidelines for clinical practice are fully and strictly adhered to. Buddhist meditation and Mahayana tradition of self-exploration / self-liberation are integrated with the more traditional treatment interventions. Language and semiotics are used as the main vehicles of understanding, (de)constructing, communicating and transforming subjective experience. Cognitive, strategic, systemic and humanistic techniques are used adjunctively, as needed.

However, in spite of its manifest interdisciplinary character, postmodern psychotherapy is not discipline-bound nor theory-centered and does not attempt to be eclectic or integrative.

Instead, it can be best understood as being subject-centered in its focus on the here-and-now of the subjective experience co-constructed by inter-subjective “subject-objects”, both in life and in therapy.  

The ultimate purpose of life is life itself.  

Life is to be appreciated. Human beings desire and deserve to be happy. Physical and psychological health and freedom from symptoms (medical / health model) are necessary but not sufficient. One also needs transcendence (spirituality), beauty (aesthetics), morality (ethics), truthfulness (philosophy) and right action to realize oneself.

Postmodern Psychotherapy has been particularly useful in the treatment of the disorders of the Self, also referred to as Personality Disorders, where biological and behavioral approaches have only a peripheral role.

 

The Self, a phenomenological center of one’s subjectivity, is that which is aware of its own being-experience.  

 

What "is" the awareness of "being-experience"? Who is being-aware? What is Self?

The moment one becomes aware of oneself, the Mind is divided into an object and a subject. Without that division there is no awareness, no consciousness, no human subject, no inter-subjectivity.

There is only this.....

the last word of any mystical / spiritual search....

just this......

 

Postmodern Psychotherapy with its grounding in psychoanalysis, Buddhism and cognitive science is at the center of exploration of the Self, subjectivity and their psychopathology – Personality Disorders.

 

Recently, postmodern psychology has also been applied in behavioral economics in an attempt to understand and predict human behavior in business, management,  marketing and in stock market buy / sell investment decisions of individual investors.

 


A role of Buddhism in Postmodern Psychotherapy

Buddhism liberates, offers a glimpse into the absolute, a sense of transcendence in the realization of fundamental emptiness, realization of the emptiness of the present moment, the emptiness of existence and mind, psychotherapy gives one skills to unlock the mind, to diagnose the symptoms, unearth their causes and to heal them.

Buddhism’s “suffering” (duhkha) manifests itself as psychological, or psychiatric “dis-ease”, or symptoms, symptoms which are individual, private, mine, yours, even if the same ones in many, if not all of us.

Life is full of suffering because of a fundamental lack, not only a perception of a lack, but the actual lack of our absence

If the absence is lacking, then there is suffering. Of course there are moments of great joy, love, ecstasy, in fact there is the entire spectrum of human emotions arising from just being alive and human, but the lack of your absence – which is nothing but your life – is the source of your suffering. Our very existence originates from the lack of absence, so there is that actual experience of not being absent, of the lack, of not not-being there, and that lack, life itself, is causing suffering.

That fundamental suffering manifests itself as psychiatric and psychological symptoms so well described in the DSM system of psychopathology. Depression, suicide, panic attacks, anxiety, perversions, addictions, violence, psychosis, hundreds of other. They are real, they exist, we all do suffer in some way. And that suffering and symptoms is where Buddhism and psychotherapy meet. They both address the same aspect of life and being. One might say, that therapy then moves on to devise a system of healing, systems of alleviating of the suffering, of reducing, decreasing, eliminating or controlling the symptoms. Hundreds of systems have evolved to do just that – the major ones being psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic/psychodynamic therapy, cognitive behavior therapy, and psychopharmacology.

 

Buddhism and postmodern psychotherapy are similar to the extent they both attempt to understand the Mind and find a way to alleviate human suffering.

 

In Buddhism, the essence of the Mind (sunyata) and the ubiquity of suffering (duhkha) are, arguably, best described by the Mahayana doctrines of Emptiness and Interdependent Origination and by the Four Noble Truths, while the Eightfold Path (sila, samadhi, prajna) charts the general path towards personal liberation (Nirvana, Enlightenment).

Correspondingly, postmodern psychotherapy combines cognitive psychology and psychoanalytic theory to describe how minds work and borrows from the DSM system of classification of psychiatric symptoms to catalogue diverse manifestations of individual suffering (anxiety, depression, psychosis, personality disorders, etc.)

 

Duhkha, the first of the Four Noble Truths and the Buddhist term for any form of dis-ease, pain and suffering corresponds to the inherent conflictedness of our lives and the inescapable presence of psychological symptoms addressed in any psychotherapy.

 

To understand the potential role of Buddhism in postmodern psychotherapy on has to understand why people suffer.

 

And we do not mean the physical pain, although, it may actually be involved, we really mean the psychological pain, despair, anguish, anxiety, depression, psychosis, alienation, self-destructive behavior, aggression, suicide, etc. There are many ways in which people suffer, and the pain takes on infinite and infinitely subtle manifestations so well depicted in art and so often seen in clinical practice.  But is suffering limited to people only? Everybody would agree that all animals experience physical pain, but how about the “mental” pain –depression, loss, anxiety? And what about other forms of life? Is suffering contingent on having a mind? Consciousness? Self? Do plants and trees suffer? And how about inanimate object? Can we imagine a river or a mountain suffering? Do industrial or human waste dumped into delicately balanced ecosystems of our land creates a form of suffering? If it destroys life and living organisms, pollutes water and soil, poisons and sickens people who live there – does it create some sort of universal suffering?

What are the boundaries of suffering – when her child is in pain, the mother suffers, somehow child’s and mother’s pain are connected or maybe even really just being one, even if we can’t see it as long as we function within the more narrow sense of our individuality restricted to inside of our skin? Do we suffer when others suffers? And what empathy really is? Is it resonating with the other or is it experiencing the same state, emotional, physical or psychological?

And what about a farmer, a rancher who can’t sleep at night when his land or his cattle is destroyed by a natural or man made disaster? Individual pain is never just individual, it transcends, it permeates all those who are sensitive enough to experience it.

 

Buddhism asserts that all duhkha results from some form of desire, including the desire for existence and the desire for non-existence. Similarily, postmodern theory places psychological symptoms in the realm of Desire and Lack (wish, instinct, drive, motive, need, deficit, deprivation, etc.), fundamental precursors of any individual self, identity and behavior.

 

Buddhism does not elaborate on the “how” of how symptoms develop, why depression and not anxiety, why obsessive rituals and not panic attacks. In Buddhism, all suffering is one suffering, the suffering of the Universe. And the Buddhist Eightfold Path is presented as a way out. Right understanding, right speech, right action, right life - what on the surface of it appears a uniform prescription for all, is, in its actual implementation, completely individualized. It is always, ultimately, my right speech, my right understanding, my action, my suffering, my life, and this is where psychotherapy and Buddhism overlap. It is a person attempting to change him/herself…and anything that pertains to changing mind, speech or behavior is, by definition, a realm of psychology. The same thing looked at from two different perspectives. 

Not only two perspectives but two different methods. And it is  the methods where Buddhism and psychotherapy begin to diverge. Psychotherapy is codified in the psychoanalytic and the cognitive paradigms, psychopharmacology, inpatient crisis interventions, the entire “mental health” industry as we know it. Buddhism is different, with its meditation at the core, teacher / student matrix of interactions, its monasticism, Sangha, precepts, vows, mind-to-mind-transmission, Buddhism approaches a person completely differently.     

And there is the outcome, the end, or is there? What is the prescriptive outcome of Buddhist practice? The art of happiness? Compassion? Boddhisatva’s realized and actualized enlightenment? And what is the outcome of psychotherapy? At bare minimum, alleviation of symptoms, a lack of diagnosable mental disorder. Happiness? Health? Adjustment? Insight? Freud’s “ability to play, work and love”?

It is easy to see that there are similarities and differences here. Capacity for happiness and insight overlap for Buddhism and psychotherapy, enlightenment is clearly not even addressed in therapy, usually relegated, and rightly so, to the realm of religion. But what is “enlightenment” in Buddhism? Maybe it exists in psychology under different names? Mystical experience, peak experience? “Flow” in the “zone”? From James and Maslow to contemporary post- modernists, there has always been a great interest in the transcendental in psychology. Freud and Jung grappled with it. Is compassion similar to empathy? Altruism? What is health, happiness, compassion?

This area needs more clarification of those basic terms to sort through it, but just looking at it, it appears that even in the outcome, there are great similarities, or at least similar concepts which may, or may not, actually denote similar realities.

So, in summary, it looks that in Buddhism and psychotherapy the nature of  “the problem” is similar – suffering manifesting itself in psychological and psychiatric symptoms. The solutions are very different – psychotherapy vs. Buddhist practice; the outcomes may actually be more similar than not…when the terminology and concepts are clarified.  

And, fundamentally, there is only one soul, one mind, to treat and to save. Some say that we do not need to divide it into different conceptual fields of practice and treatment. There is only one person in front of a therapist or a Buddhist teacher. A person who seems to need some sort of help or liberation. So when we sit in front of each other, it is yet another Mysterium of a healing dialogue, because, somehow, words heal your suffering and my alienation from you. And, as we talk, as you reveal yourself even more to me, I don’t know if I am being Buddhist or just therapeutic. Actually, I forget myself in your story. What is psychotherapy anyway? Somehow people have realized that speaking heals, brings things out, to focus, focus of the mind, two minds. You and me, leaning over your illness, your pain, touching it with words, touching it with attention, feelings and our imagination, ourselves touched, as we discover the new and the old buried under the skin of our minds.

Your words flow, language flows, and we change the direction, telling, retelling, listening, hearing, till the pain dissolves. Even if life does not have a rewind button, we can change the past in the present of our dialogue. Living without a possibility of return is living in the Real, but there can also be the Imaginary transformed by the Symbolic…..

And there is the lack, the lack of absence, the lack of emptiness, your life, and there is the emptiness of the lack….a possibility for healing and liberation.

 


 
Postmodern Psychotherapy

 

.....only the Mind itself can end the endless chain of suffering karma....

 

The inter-subjective of one's "dis-ease" can be transformed in at least one of the following four ways:

  • direct intervention in the neurochemical functioning of the brain e.g. psychotropic  medications, mind-altering substances, nutrition, foods

  • indirect intervention in the functioning of the nervous system, e.g. meditation, yoga, sports, sex, socialization, changes in life style 

  • direct change of the external context  – any action / behavior altering one's actual life situation / life style, e.g. initiating or ending a relationship, job change, geographical re-location, resolution / removal of actual stressors

  • direct transformation of  the subjective experience  via psychotherapy (insight, re-framing, new understanding, new knowledge, working through, etc)

 

Initial consultation 

 

  • The purpose of the initial consultation is to articulate the reason(s) for the visit and to formulate it in the language of postmodern psychotherapy.
  • A full initial psychodynamic formulation and a complete DSM-IV-TR diagnosis are usually arrived at and discussed within the first 1-3 visits.
  • Additional tests and consults are often suggested to clarify the diagnosis.
  • The use of medications is discussed and recommended if indicated.
  • Treatment options and fees are discussed and the decision whether to enter a treatment contract is made.
  • All necessary referrals are made to assure continuity of care.
 Treatment 
  • Individual psychotherapy sessions 1 – 5 times per week, 50 min or longer, if needed.
  • Individual study – a list of selected books, articles, films, poetry, art work and music are assigned for individual study. Online resources are made available.
  • Mindfulness training - Buddhist meditation is encouraged, 30 – 60 min daily. Work with a Buddhist meditation teacher is strongly recommended. Meditation instruction in all major Buddhist traditions and ongoing support are provided.
  • Group psychotherapy – recommended, if indicated.
  • Individual assignments – activities, research and other tasks may be prescribed based on the ongoing psychodynamic formulation.
  • All treatment is provided by a Licensed Ph.D. Psychologist or a Board Certified Psychiatrist
  • Treatment may be completed within a few sessions or remain open-ended, as needed.

 

MIND Then and Now 

It was the clear blue of the lake, small tongue of sand,  waves’ quiet whisper, luring them to wake up early, to go in, right at sunrise and run from hill cottages, among pine trees, over the earthen dike, run to throw themselves into the surface of water, clear for all of them, to be shared with small fish and plants floating quietly, flies and mosquitoes chasing each other in the fata morgana of moist of the morning, as their skin broke thin top layer of water - it was usually warmer there - and then, face first, they’d dive deeper, into darker cold, closer to the sand bottom, as if they wanted to stay there longer, as long as they could, maybe there was a bit of competition between them, but it might have been simply a way of exploding with joy of the moment, a joy of just being-in-the-morning, as their bodies just swam, in and out, gasping for air after each stroke, in and out, breathing, eyes seeing only blurred, in water, and then suddenly jumping up and out into the bright, and then in again, the rhythm itself was a dance, as much as dance and breath are expression of joy of Being, they swam out to the middle of the lake, away from the sand and reed, and the pine trees looming over them, there was also the pleasure of exertion, pleasure of movement in waking up, but also knowing that breakfast was already waiting,  was going to be there later, and that the time had no end , then, time had only a horizon of a few hours and the beyond of the horizon was a “Beyond”,  unknown, only to be anticipated with excitement, innocent yet somehow knowing, or maybe just assuming, because it had not been contradicted yet,  that it was going to bring more shreds of new life, moments of requisite delight of being alive and only 10.

There  were also rare moments of complete peace and serenity permeating entire body and mind, quietude of each day, simple morning rituals, simple foods, the sun, the lake, boats, swimming, and the meadow there, the meadow which later became an archetype of some basic trust and serenity he carried within himself for many, many years later

The meadow extended behind the dike as the flow of water narrowed and became an underground fall emptying into a long sedate canal leading to an old German dam and fortified underground bunkers five flooded floors deep, with dark shafts evoking a sense of the ultimate mystery, mystery that could never be resolved anyway, associated with sadness of never knowing, an impossibility of knowing certain things, or maybe the impossibility of time to stop, or to reverse itself, to see what was, or to stop what is, and also they conveyed a sense of some greater purpose, the Germans fortifying the land to stop the Russian Red Army from advancing west, and also knowing about their ultimate failure, the war, the dead who must have been somewhere here, still, and the military bunkers were bigger, stronger than anything else they had ever seen, and all that now uncannily quiet, sleeping in tall grass, field flowers, trees which must have been there then, but now it all conveyed a sense of time lost, of another world which was but somehow continued into the present.....

Ironically, on the other side of the lake, was an old fort, old as reaching back to the ninth or maybe even eight century, to the time of Piasts, the original settlers there, the ones first converted to Christianity by Roman explores, the Piasts who were the first owners of this land later fought over by Germans and Poles for the next 10 centuries, it was a fort which used to be an old harbor where the lake somehow deepened, or its bottom dug out,  to receive old ships or barges transporting people and goods to the other sides and shore of the lake. They tried to reach the bottom of the lake with a long string and a metal weight attached to it but they ran out of the string after the first 100  meters? – was it deeper than that or was it something else devouring the string as it descended into that impenetrable, dark and cold beyond the acceptable cold they knew, reaching beyond what could be seen, letting fantasies, imagination and stories run out of control for generations?

And the stories were mainly internal, infusing minds with a mix of images and narratives, myths and archetypes which were born and lived there, in that land, and that grounding in the actual reality of the past, of the unconscious, touching it since the very first moments of life, swimming in those lakes, touching tombs of the past in old Jewish and German cemeteries, right behind their house, where they went to play, the presence of death was a fact, its factuality was a constant presence as they jumped over graves hiding among family monuments, hiding in undergrounds crypts, the imminent company of death and the past was a reality, the past was not to be discovered as in other places, the past was the present and although they did not know it, only the past was missing for others there.

And the Mind became multiple universes in their growing brains, isn’t it what Mind is, anyway,  multiple universes growing in our brains? As they lived on, the images of the old, old and new narratives, suffused,  contained and transformed together, made the inside outside, made the dead live again, in the young ones, isn’t Mind that which imprints itself on life all the time, unless, of course, that one life is a deviant outlier, free to be different?

So the old lived in him, along with the solitude of forests and lakes, with the beauty of the land ravished by countless wars rolling over, trench to trench, leaving rusting bayonets for children to find, a  generation later, for  young boys to blow up themselves with old land mines left there, or old munition they were not allowed to touch but did, of course, anyway, how could they contain their curiosity?

And all that lived in him, and more came later, as he eventually discovered that he was the old within the new, always being both in his mind then and now. 

......and the world was infinitely pure then, smelled of morning cows ready to give milk, as they both walked to the village every morning with a battered milk bucket, already expecting the fat white foam bubble in their mouths, and the sun rays flickered in trees and flowers by the old dirt road leading to a summer they did not then know...... 

June 2002


 

Waiting for American Dogen

(Maitreya Buddha)

 

Buddha usually appear as “this very moment”, however perceived or defined. Being always “just that…..” Buddhas may or may not be perceived as Buddhas by others, nevertheless, they always continue being Buddhas just as they are. However, since the “as they are” is inherently empty and not any fixed entity, Buddhas appear as simply “this” […….] or “that” [……..], as me and you, as “this very moment” and as the entire Universe. 

They “appear” only when Mind appears (…) divided into its object / subject modes of Being.  

Whenever a Buddha realizes that he or she is Buddha as a human being, the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha rejoice, leap forward, and “Buddhism” takes yet another turn. 

 

The last 2,600 years of Buddhism have been marked by such occasional appearance of realized Buddhas, of spiritual guides, whose insights, understanding or manifestation of the Dharma not only subsumed and included all prior teaching traditions but also reformulated them into a new philosophical turn, new school or spiritual paradigm.

Today, two centuries after Buddhism was introduced to the West, many practitioners in this country wonder how long will it take for another Buddha, another uniquely enlightened mind, another Nagarjuna, Asanga, Milarepa, Hui-Neng, Hakuin or Dogen to appear in American Buddhism?

 

Alas for all of us, as the timeline in the box below suggests, it may to take quite a long time again.

 

In the past, it was always at least 600 years after Buddhism was first transplanted to a new culture or country before a truly original teacher / reformer would appear – suggesting, if one can extrapolate from history – that it may take another 450 years for one to emerge here, in the West.

 

  • In its birthplace, India, almost an entire millennium passed, before early Buddhism, proselytized by Siddharta Gautama around 500 B.C., spread throughout Southeast Asia and Tibet and matured into its philosophical pinnacle manifested by Madhyamika (Nagarjuna  200 – 300 AD), and Yogacara (Asanga and Vasubandhu  300 – 400 AD).

  • In China, over 500 years passed since the time Buddhism was first introduced (ca. 100 B.C.  – 100 A.D.) to the arrival of Boddhidarma ( 500 A.D), the legendary Indian monk who became the First Patriarch of Chan (Zen).

  • It took another 150 years and five more generations of teachers after Boddhidarma, before Hui Neng (638 – 674), the revered Sixth Patriarch appeared, and additional 200 years for Lin-chi (Rinzai) (d. 867) and Ts’ao-tung (Soto) ( 830) schools of Chan (Zen) to emerge.

  • Over 1,000 years passed in China, since Buddhism was first introduced, to the time when the first two major Zen koan collections – “Blue Cliff Record” (1125 A.D.) and “The Gateless Gate” (ca 1228 A.D.) were compiled.

  • Similarly, even if Buddhism arrived to Japan as early as 550 A.D., it took more than 250 years for it to fully settle in Kyoto during the Heian Period ( 800) and another 400 years to culminate in the Kamakura Period (1185  -  1333 A.D.).

  • Again, Buddhism was widely present in Japan for at least 650 years before the spiritual and poetic genius of Dogen and his mystical masterpiece Shobogenzo (1200 – 1253) appeared and established Soto Zen’s Ehei-ji temple as a major presence in the Japanese Mahayana Buddhism.

  • After Dogen, it was another 400 years more till the time when Hakuin (1686 – 1769) reformed Rinzai Zen and its use of koans at the Ryutaku-ji temple in Japan where it still continues today.

  • Buddhism was originally introduced to the West, about 1800, and it still seems to be in its infancy today.

  • Several generations of Asian pioneer teachers struggled with cultural and language barriers for several decades, as they attempted to bring authentic practice to the US and Europe.

  • First legitimate non-Asian Buddhist teachers began to emerge in the second half of the last century (ca 1950 –2000) and a transition to the second and third generations of teachers is currently under way in all major Buddhist traditions, nationwide.

 

 

More time is needed for Buddhism to take root on the American soil, more time to assimilate with the culture at large and to mature enough for its new, truly Western, form to eventually emerge.

Even more time is probably needed for an American teacher, another Nagarjuna, Asanga, Milarepa, Hui-Neng, Hakuin or Dogen to appear in the U.S., a teacher who will not only conclude the transmission of Dharma to this new land but who will also legitimize American Buddhism as a new and fully autonomous tradition.

 

And when it finally arrives, what is the American Buddhism likely to be, 400 - 500 years from now?

How is that future American Maitreya Buddha, likely to lead, galvanize and propel American Buddhism into its next Millennium?

 

Historically, Buddhism, born out of Hinduism and Yoga traditions in ancient India, has always tended to absorb native spiritual tradition and culture of the country to which it arrived. As it moved East throughout Asia, it merged with Confucianism and Taoism in China, assimilated shamanism in Tibet and adapted to the Shinto Samurai culture in Japan.

 

Similarly, the future of American Buddhism is likely to be shaped by the entire Western / American culture and its future evolution in the time to come. 

 

One can anticipate that, by the year 2,500, American Buddhism in will have assimilated and merged  with the following “Western” influences:

 

  • Democracy – contrary to more autocratic, male dominated Asian model, American Buddhists will embrace more democratic, egalitarian / libertarian approach, with man and women practicing together in centers governed by elective process where the role of a teacher is separate from the center’s administrator. A full spectrum of training models will develop, from more traditional monastic institutions to lay centers which are likely to grow in popularity. The Western appreciation of individuality, democracy and transparency will result in more horizontal, egalitarian approach to the interpretation of the Dharma, with multiple, loosely related “lineages” and a marketplace of individual preachers. Paradoxically, this model is likely to resemble the origins of Buddhism in 600 B.C. India where wondering “seekers” / “monks” gathered only during rain seasons to study and practice in one place and only to resume their individual/ solitary search afterwards. An individual “hermit” / Boddhisatva / preacher model is likely to emerge, in addition to more organized Buddhism-as-religion. 

 

  • Science– science in general, and quantum physics and Unified Theory (when available) will replace Mahayana Buddhism as the new paradigm for the understanding of the Universe, Mind and Emptiness. American Buddhism will not only embrace science as the preferred language of the Dharma but a new, Scientific Buddhism will emerge as the dominant “school” of Buddhism not only in the West but worldwide. 

 

  • Psychology – both Buddhism and psychology endeavor to alleviate suffering and to grasp the nature of Mind. Psychology without the Mysterium of spirituality and mysticism is incomplete, Buddhism without postmodern psychology is naïve. Buddhism will eventually adopt the language of cognitive neuroscience and psychology to redefine itself within the Western culture. Insights of psychology, psychiatry, brain science and psychotherapy will not only inform any serious spiritual training and practice in the future but will also permeate the “Western” interpretation of the Madhyamika / Yogacara Dharma. Buddhist teachers of the future are likely to undergo formal training in at least one of the above disciplines to match ever evolving psychological-mindedness of their Western practitioners. Seated meditation and mindfulness will continue as the key elements distinguishing Buddhists practice from other traditions.

 

·        Language – translating Buddhism into the Western context will impose the English language and its vocabulary on the Dharma. A complete translation of most of Sanscrit, Chinese, Tibetan and Japanese texts should be completed within the next 100 years and most of the Buddhist canon will be available to Western readers in English. Terminology and understanding of particular terms is likely to evolve to adjust to the usage within the Western culture. New, original, modern  “sutras”, or Dharma texts, will appear and gradually replace the old ones. Future, American, Nagarjuna, Asanga, Milarepa, Hui-Neng, Hakuin and Dogen will “re-write” the old texts and create a uniquely English-language “school” of Buddhism. 

 

  • Postmodern / postindustrial culture – Buddhism preceded some ideas typically associated with deconstruction and postmodernism for over 2,600 years. The lack (emptiness) of the subject and form, decentralization / multiplicity (Absolute / Relative) of signification and truth, quantum physics and interdependent origination – all point to inescapable parallels between Buddhism and the postmodern. The future Buddhism will continue to evolve within the postmodern Western culture and will become increasingly permeated by its ideas and values. Environmentalism and “engaged” Buddhism will play a significant role in defining how Buddhists will function in the future global / local marketplace.

 

  • Technology –Buddhism will evolve in the Millennium dominated by science and its applications - technology. In a few decades we will be able to effectively manipulate our genetic codes, and hence the life itself, will learn how to control and change, at will, our states of mind through new advances in molecular neuropsychopharmacology, and will be able to immerse ourselves in computerized virtual realities of our choice, leaving more mundane chores to increasingly more efficacious and omnipresent artificial intelligence tools and robotic appliances. Instantaneous visual-audio global access to any information, person or place anywhere on Earth, via the next generations of the Internet, will be taken for granted. Biological computers and ultramicrochip-enhanced biological implants will merge technology with brain functions, altering cognition, consciousness and the sense of individual identity. The new American “Scientific Buddhism” will emerge  to embrace technology as its new “Great Vehicle” to ferry all sentient beings to the other shore of Existence.

 

  • Judeo-Christian tradition – Buddhism will assimilate many of the contemporary Judeo-Christian forms of monastic and lay practice, ranging from the Catholic monastery / church / priest model to the Episcopalian / Protestant / Baptist minister / preacher / congregation formats of practice. Buddhism will continue to struggle with the concept of Judeo-Christian monotheistic God.  Interfaith dialogue(s) will emerge to clarify basic ideas and to enhance mutual understanding. The concepts of God and Buddha-Mind, along with neuroscience, will take the center stage in the multidisciplinary debate on the nature of the mind and spiritual and religious life.

 

  • Global marketplace – American Buddhism will embrace wholesome, not-for-profit entrepreneurial self-sufficiency, simplicity and non-attachment rather than poverty and asceticism. Although Buddhism originally developed within tribal / feudal cultures of ancient India, China and Japan, we are now witnessing an increasing emphasis on economic self-reliance rather than on alms-gathering or feudal / government donations and support. Sophisticated fund raising, students / members fees and small business ventures are likely to become dominant sources of income for Buddhist centers in the future. Separation of the spiritual teaching from the economics, similar to that of church / state in the society at large, will have to be strictly observed to prevent perception of exploitation. The issues of property ownership or de facto property control by teachers, non-attachment vs poverty vs asceticism will have to be addressed and resolved as a Dharma question and within the American Sangha to assure integrity, purity and depth of future practice.

 

The future is always different from our speculations about it. However, we know that Buddhism will have to change in its encounter with the West. The old Theravada / Mahayana tradition will be, eventually, replaced by a new "school" or paradigm.

Since science and technology, along with democracy and global marketplace, are the most dominant forces shaping the world today, the postmodern science will become the next discourse of Buddhism, not only in the West but worldwide.   

That fully autonomous American / Western Scientific Buddhism will need a teacher, who like others did before, will propel it into the next Millennia. That person, whoever he/she will be, will find a way to translate the Dharma into a new language of science, psychology, cognitive neuroscience and postmodern / postindustrial culture.

 

To save all sentient beings, we all need to do our best to make it happen as soon as possible.

 

Buddha usually appear as “this very moment”, however perceived or defined. Being always “just that…..” Buddhas may or may not be perceived as Buddhas by others, nevertheless, they always continue being Buddhas just as they are. However, since the “as they are” is inherently empty and not any fixed entity, Buddhas appear as simply “this” […….] or “that” [……..], as me and you, as “this very moment” and as the entire Universe. 

They “appear” only when Mind appears (…) divided into its object / subject modes of Being.  

Whenever a Buddha realizes that he or she is Buddha as a human being, the Buddha, the Dharma and the Sangha rejoice, leap forward, and “Buddhism” takes yet another turn. 

 


 

More psychological meditations:

 

Psychological Meditations

Buddhism and Psychology 

Buddhist Practice and Psychotherapy 

American Maitreya Buddha

Mind, God, Self & Reality 

Having Seen God 

Living Buddhism

Post/Modern Psychology 

Master Dogen on Zen koan MU 

Zen koan MU & the true text 

10 Questions for a Buddhist Teacher 

Zen Master Dogen on "Existence"  

Questions about American Zen 

What is Self?  

Postmodern  Psychoanalysis

Mind, Meditation & Awareness  

Liberation & Free Will

 


 

Copyright © 1999 - 2010 by MIND is | New York City |  All Rights Reserved.  Last updated: Monday, February 18, 2008 05:38:23 PM